Subject	as I would LOVE to agree...but
Posted by	turboz32 on February 12, 2008 at 5:31 PM
	This message has been viewed 60 times.
In Reply To	Re: New "Rotary" engine posted by twin3037 on February 12, 2008 at 05:05 PM
Message	but this quasiturbine would not handle to well under higher tempurature or RPM becaue of the joints heating up so fast not to mention its a metal to metal collision when creating the area for the intake of air/fuel... basically its a timebomb waiting to blow itself apart or at least that what i saw...
Follow Ups	New "Rotary" engine - swensonhimer 16:58:03 02/12/08 Re: New "Rotary" engine - twin3037 17:05:23 02/12/08 as I would LOVE to agree...but - turboz32 17:31:33 02/12/08 agreed. (n/m) - nemo1080 17:37:42 02/12/08 Looks like loads of fun to rebuild. (n/m) - CameronSF 17:12:53 02/12/08 this is where its at - gt300zxtt 17:29:20 02/12/08 So does this mean we are going back to air cooled - NisBo 17:57:59 02/12/08 SCAM!!! I've seen this many times before... - icsamerica 20:16:34 02/12/08 as can be said about 99.9% of all prospective technologies - LJZTT 21:38:27 02/12/08 Interesting design... seems possible (n/m) - 550HPTT 20:38:07 02/12/08 Wait... where do the turbos go? ;) (n/m) - Crim 21:25:15 02/12/08 Coates engines are where its at. - Knapper411 22:45:31 02/12/08 Just one of many "rotary" type engines - NytWolf 22:55:31 02/12/08
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.